Project Proposal: Security semantic conventions #1838
Conversation
trisch-me
requested review from
alolita,
austinlparker,
danielgblanco,
dyladan,
jpkrohling,
mtwo,
svrnm,
tedsuo and
trask
as code owners
Co-authored-by: Reiley Yang <[email protected]>
|
Hi all, just to say I'd be interested in participating in this group, once it gets setup. |
|
Hi! I'd be interested in participating too, as I work on projects that produce security data. It's hard for me to commit long-term at the moment, but I'm happy to help in initial efforts. |
|
Link check fails with this url from Readme for |
|
Hey! Dynatrace is interested in joining this initiative. I would like to join the kick-off meeting of this project to understand the scope and timeline better. Based on this information we also want to nominate an expert for this project. Thank you! |
danielgblanco
added
the
area/project-proposal
danielgblanco
changed the title
Co-authored-by: Armin Ruech <[email protected]>
|
@trisch-me Mondays 4pm usually work for me, but next week is an exception, I won't be available unfortunately :( I should be able to join the following meetings. |
|
For visibility I'm posting here also a link to the open telemetry calendar |
|
@trisch-me Thank you for kicking this off. Following up on my initial comment, I want to participate in this group. Please add me. |
|
@mdelfabro thank you for joining. Please join also our slack channel #otel-security-wg in CNCF |
Co-authored-by: Trask Stalnaker <[email protected]>
|
Hi @trisch-me, I'd be very interested in participating in this working group as a domain expert if possible. I'm UK-based, and I work for Grafana Labs as part of their their Security team. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good. Minor comment for future nomenclature used in other PRs or comms (don't want to block this because of it): we have dropped the usage of Working Groups and now refer to SIGs, which could be temporary or permanent. We'll also need a GC liaison as with any other GC (which could be assigned when the SIG is added to the list of SIGs)
* first proposal for security project * fix spell * Update projects/security.md Co-authored-by: Reiley Yang <[email protected]> * add more experts * add another expert * add companies names to the spellcheck * refine project timeline and description * Update projects/security.md Co-authored-by: Armin Ruech <[email protected]> * update sponsor and meeting time * added slack channel * add expert * update slack name Co-authored-by: Trask Stalnaker <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Reiley Yang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Armin Ruech <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Trask Stalnaker <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Severin Neumann <[email protected]>
* first proposal for security project * fix spell * Update projects/security.md Co-authored-by: Reiley Yang <[email protected]> * add more experts * add another expert * add companies names to the spellcheck * refine project timeline and description * Update projects/security.md Co-authored-by: Armin Ruech <[email protected]> * update sponsor and meeting time * added slack channel * add expert * update slack name Co-authored-by: Trask Stalnaker <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Reiley Yang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Armin Ruech <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Trask Stalnaker <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Severin Neumann <[email protected]>
|
@kelnage I have added you to the group. Please join our meetings Mondays and also our slack channel as described in the description. Looking forward to working with you! |
|
Hey everyone, please join otel community https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/main/community-membership.md in order to be added to the list of approvers. Also please let me know if you all still have time to work in this SIG so I would update list accordingly |
As discussed during SemConv WG meeting I have created a proposal for security project to start discussions around this new domain within community
There are not all of the points covered there as we need to discuss them first or they need to be defined after the group is created